Dustin K MacDonald

Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Economic and Community Development
  • Nonprofit Management
    • Counselling and Service Delivery
    • Suicide Prevention / Crisis Intervention
  • Politics and Governance
  • Math and Statistics
  • Salesforce
Menu

Core Competencies of Intelligence Analysis

Posted on July 16, 2017November 23, 2019 by Dustin

Core competencies are the basic cognitive building blocks that are required of a good intelligence analyst. Much has been written on the elements that make an individual an effective analyst and throughout this course you will have the opportunity to build these skills as well.

Table of Contents [hide]

Objectivity

Objectivity refers to the ability to be fair and impartial. It’s important for intelligence analysts to possess this core competency because if you approach analysis with a bias, you will produce slanted results.

One tactic to improve objectivity is war gaming, where you adopt one side of an analytic problem, while you face against another analyst who is adopting the other side. Ideally you will occasionally be “friendly” and occasionally “foe”, so that you can see how you reach different decisions than your colleagues and what biases may underpin those.

Independence of Political Consideration

This element is a special form of objectivity. Sometimes pressure from political figures can cause you to alter intelligence estimates for ones that are more favourable. This is not limited just to national security (as one might imagine a President or Secretary of State’s influence on a National Intelligence Estimate), but also occurs in Law Enforcement where the Police Chief may wish for intelligence projecting a decrease in organized crime even while data does not support this.

Timeliness

Timeliness should be obvious. Intelligence is useless if it is not produced or disseminated in time for those who rely on it to be able to take action based on it. Time management techniques or other workflow strategies (including automating elements of the task, where possible) may help.

Analytic Standards

Analytic standards are the elements of intelligence tradecraft that all analysts should be able to do. They are listed below.

Describe Quality and Reliability of Underlying Sources

The ability to assess the quality (usefulness of information) and reliability (likelihood of being correct) of underlying sources is an important element in producing good intelligence. The old adage “garbage in, garbage out”, applies here.

This element is particularly important in analytic techniques like Bayesian Analysis, where assessing reliability numerically is a requirement to using the formula.

Caveats and Expresses Uncertainties or Confidence in Analytic Judgement

Related to the previous point, if an analyst is uncertain (or very certain) about a specific piece of intelligence, they must be able to indicate that for the benefit of consumers. Given that an intelligence report may contain a variety of statements, with varying levels of confidence and classifications, clearly indicating the belief in or caveats about intelligence will help consumers act on this information with confidence.

The book An Introduction to Intelligence Research and Analysis (Clauser, 2008) provides a modified version of the Sherman-Kent table for expressing confidence in a judgement:

Chances
(For – Against)
Textual Certainty
100 – 0 Certainty, No Estimate
99 – 1

85 – 15

Almost Certain, Highly Likely
84 – 16

55 – 45

Probable, Likely, Pobably, We Believe
51 – 49

50 – 50

49 – 51

Chance Just Better Than Even, On Balance

Chances Are Even

Chances Just Less Than Even

45 – 55

16 – 84

It is Doubtful, We Doubt, Improbable, Unlikely, Probably Not
15 – 81

1 – 99

Almost Certainly Not, Highly Unlikely, Chances are Slight
0 – 100 Impossibility, No Estimate

Distinguishes Between Underlying Intelligence and Analysts’ Assumptions and Judgements

This element refers to the need to clearly explain where something is supported by evidence and interpretation of that evidence and where something is explained by assumptions and judgement.

This can seem like a tricky one, because we imagine that all intelligence involves some level of assumption or judgement when we perform any analysis. The difference is that we usually don’t have all the elements required to make an analysis and must declare what we are filling in.

As an example, if we make a statement in an an analytical product that the Soviet Union is going to collapse in 1989 (as it did), we may cite a variety of regulatory changes, statements from key leadership and other economic, social and political factors that we believe will contribute to the dissolution of the Soviet Union. These things may require an assumption – that the economic system in the Soviet Union is not capable of being replaced.

If we believe this, but fail to state it, it may colour our analysis and make it more difficult for consumers of our products to act on them. Additionally, it makes critical thinking exercises more difficult because we haven’t separated out where we can brainstorm.

Incorporates Alternative Analysis Where Appropriate

Speaking of brainstorming, this element involves the capability to provide alternative explanations in highly charged, uncertain or controversial areas.

This must be approached carefully, it does your consumer no good to provided with two analyses that are in direct contradiction to each other with no context (in that case you might as well be a weatherman saying there’s a 50% chance of rain and a 50% chance of no rain.)

Instead, providing an alternative analysis by highlighting how a key piece of intelligence that the analysis hinges on allows the consumer to consider the possibility.

As an example, if one part of your analysis reveals your belief that Afghanistan irregular forces have obtained access to chemical weapons, but this is based on having received funding from another terrorist group whose origin has not been traced yet, showing how the absence of this funding would change the estimate (either by altering the timeline for them to obtain chemical weapons or by removing the possibility altogether) will make a more comprehensive analytical product.

Demonstrates the Relevance of the Product to U.S. National Security

This point is relevant to the ODNI’s mission, which is to provide strategic intelligence in support of US National Security. An analytical product that does not clearly indicate its usefulness to the consumers that an ODNI analyst has access to is a waste of precious resources.

In a different context, this element could be renamed “Demonstrates the Relevance of the Product to Consumers.”

Uses Logical Argumentation

Avoiding the use of bias and arguing your points logically is helpful in ensuring that your arguments are sound. This can include being able to structure and recognize valid argument forms, recognize fallacies and work through arguments systematically.

Exhibits Consistency of Analysis Over Time

This element, which is titled in full “Exhibits Consistency of Analysis Over Time or Highlights Changes and Explains Rationale” focuses on the reliability of your estimates. This use of the word reliable is in the scientific sense, where given the same analytic information you return the same result repeatedly, suggesting a systematic, scientific approach.

If, given the same (or very similar) raw data on a situation but your estimate is radically different each time, that may suggest that you are not following a structured or reliable process. In the case that other factors have changed, indicating those helps the consumer follow your train of thought.

Makes Accurate Judgements and Assessments

Finally, making accurate judgements and assessments comes to the heart of intelligence analysis. If the forecasts you make and your judgements of the situation are consistently incorrect, your intelligence is useless.

This is not to say that being wrong or something else happening that you had expected means your product was flawed – you are attempting to measure people, rapidly changing in an environment that is unpredictable and fraught with deception and manipulation.

Rather, if your assessment is wrong, it is important to review deeply to find out why, and to integrate that knowledge into future assessments to improve your intelligence analysis skill.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Privacy Policy

See here for our privacy policy. This site uses affiliate links and Adsense ads to provide targeted advertising.

Tags

analytical technique assessment communication community development counselling crisis chat crisis intervention data science eastern university economic development education empathy evaluation forecasting fundraising governance information technology intelligence intelligence analysis keokuk county language learning legal management peer support personal development phd politics professional development protective factors psychosocial risk factors safety planning salesforce sigourney social media statistics suicide suicide assessment suicide risk assessment technology terrorism training university of the cumberlands violence risk assessment youth

Recommended Posts

  • Conducting Psychosocial Assessments
  • DCIB Model of Suicide Risk Assessment
  • ABC Model of Crisis Intervention
  • My Friend is Suicidal - What do I do?

Recent Posts

  • ITS833 Information Governance
  • Enhanced Care Management (ECM) with Salesforce
  • ITS835 Enterprise Risk Management
  • Glorifind Christian Search Engine
  • Sigourney Iowa Election Results, 2023

Archives

  • November 2023 (6)
  • October 2023 (1)
  • September 2023 (3)
  • August 2023 (1)
  • July 2023 (1)
  • May 2023 (1)
  • March 2023 (1)
  • February 2023 (2)
  • January 2023 (4)
  • December 2022 (2)
  • May 2022 (1)
  • April 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (1)
  • February 2022 (1)
  • December 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • May 2021 (3)
  • December 2020 (1)
  • November 2020 (4)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (4)
  • February 2020 (7)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • October 2019 (2)
  • September 2019 (4)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • February 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (4)
  • November 2018 (3)
  • October 2018 (3)
  • September 2018 (19)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (39)
  • May 2017 (3)
  • April 2017 (4)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (4)
  • January 2017 (5)
  • December 2016 (4)
  • November 2016 (4)
  • October 2016 (5)
  • September 2016 (4)
  • August 2016 (5)
  • July 2016 (5)
  • June 2016 (5)
  • May 2016 (3)
  • April 2016 (2)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (2)
  • January 2016 (4)
  • December 2015 (2)
  • November 2015 (2)
  • October 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (2)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (5)
  • April 2015 (3)
  • March 2015 (8)
  • February 2015 (12)
  • January 2015 (28)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Recent Comments

  • Dustin on Starting a Crisis Line or Hotline
  • HAPPINESSHEALTHCOURAGE, LLC on Starting a Crisis Line or Hotline
  • ITS833 Information Governance - Dustin K MacDonald on University of the Cumberlands PhD in Information Technology
  • Elected Officials in Sigourney, Iowa - Dustin K MacDonald on Sigourney Iowa Election Results, 2023
  • ITS 835 Enterprise Risk Management - Dustin K MacDonald on University of the Cumberlands PhD in Information Technology

Tags

analytical technique assessment communication community development counselling crisis chat crisis intervention data science eastern university economic development education empathy evaluation forecasting fundraising governance information technology intelligence intelligence analysis keokuk county language learning legal management peer support personal development phd politics professional development protective factors psychosocial risk factors safety planning salesforce sigourney social media statistics suicide suicide assessment suicide risk assessment technology terrorism training university of the cumberlands violence risk assessment youth
© 2023 Dustin K MacDonald | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Economic and Community Development
  • Nonprofit Management
    • Counselling and Service Delivery
    • Suicide Prevention / Crisis Intervention
  • Politics and Governance
  • Math and Statistics
  • Salesforce