Dustin K MacDonald

Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Economic and Community Development
  • Nonprofit Management
    • Counselling and Service Delivery
    • Suicide Prevention / Crisis Intervention
  • Politics and Governance
  • Math and Statistics
  • Salesforce
Menu

Z-Scores

Posted on January 24, 2015November 25, 2018 by Dustin

Z Scores were a concept I had trouble with in University. It’s actually not as difficult as they’re made out to be. I’ll spare you the complicated introduction (as I’m sure you got one from both your textbook and your Professor), but remember that z-scores show you the distance between your score and the mean, in standard deviations.

So a z-score of 1 is one standard deviation (approximately 84%) above the entire population, and 34% above the mean. Typically you’ll be asked to do a few things:

  • What percent above the mean is a particular z-score
  • What percent below the mean is a particular z-score
  • What percent is between two scores
  • How do you convert a raw score into a z-score
  • How do you convert a z-score into a raw score

So, let’s get too it. Remember that you’ll need a z-table (usually provided by your Professor or available in you textbook) for these exercises.

Table of Contents

Raw Score into Z-Score

The formula for converting a raw score into a z-score is Z = (M – X) / SD, or Z Score = (Mean – Value) / Standard Deviation.

So, if you have a score of 80, and the mean is 75, with a Standard Deviation of 5, your equation will be:

(80 – 75) / 5 = 1. Therefore your Z score is 1.0

If you instead scored 73, it would be (73 – 75) / 5 = -0.4.

Percent Below a Score

You’ll be given a z-score like 0.66, and you’ll need to find out what percent of scores are above it. Simply go to your z-table, and find 0.66. Some tables list all the values sequentially (0.5, 0.51, 0.52) while others use a table like Wikipedia’s.

If your table includes both “% mean to z” and “% in tail” (like my textbook), just look a the “% mean to z.” If your table uses decimals (like 0.7454), multiply them by 100 to get the correct value.

When I look up 0.66 in my textbook’s z-table, I see 24.54%. When I look up the same value in Wikipedia’s table, I see 74.54%. What gives? The % mean to z is only half of the equation. In order to return a correct z-score, you take your 24.54% and add 50 to it, because it’s a positive z-score.

If you have a negative z-score, like -0.85, you take the z-score you’re given (30.23%) and you subtract 50 from it, which gives you -19.77 (ignore the negative.), or 19.77%.

Percent Above a Score

To find the percent above a score, you perform the same calculation for percent below, but you subtract from 100. For instance, 19.77% is percent below, so when you subtract that value from 100, you get 80.23% above.

Percent Between Scores

To calculate percent between scores, you simply take the difference between two scores and subtract them. For instance, if you want to know the difference between 0.6 and 0.7:

% to mean of 0.6 is 22.57 and of 0.7 is 25.80.

Because both numbers are above the mean, we add 50 to each, giving us percentages of 72.57 and 75.80.

Subtracting 72.57 from 75.80 gives a grand total of 3.23% between the two values.

Z-Score Back to Raw Score

The formula for converting a z-score back to a raw score is R = Z*SD + M. So if your z score is 0.8, the mean is 75 and the Standard Deviation is 5, your equation looks like:

Raw Score = 0.8*5 + 75

Raw Score = 4 + 75

Raw Score = 79



Cite this article as: MacDonald, D.K., (2015), "Z-Scores," retrieved on March 30, 2023 from http://dustinkmacdonald.com/z-scores/.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Privacy Policy

See here for our privacy policy. This site uses affiliate links and Adsense ads to provide targeted advertising.

Tags

analytical technique assessment city council communication community development counselling crisis chat crisis intervention data science eastern university economic development education empathy evaluation forecasting fundraising governance humint intelligence intelligence analysis keokuk county language learning legal local government management peer support personal development politics professional development protective factors psychosocial risk factors safety planning salesforce sigourney social media statistics suicide suicide assessment suicide risk assessment technology terrorism training violence risk assessment youth

Recommended Posts

  • Conducting Psychosocial Assessments
  • DCIB Model of Suicide Risk Assessment
  • ABC Model of Crisis Intervention
  • My Friend is Suicidal - What do I do?

Recent Posts

  • University of the Cumberlands PhD in Information Technology
  • Joining the US Coast Guard Auxiliary
  • What is a Salesforce Business Analyst?
  • Why I Joined Mensa
  • NCCM Documentation

Archives

  • March 2023 (1)
  • February 2023 (2)
  • January 2023 (4)
  • December 2022 (2)
  • May 2022 (1)
  • April 2022 (2)
  • March 2022 (1)
  • February 2022 (1)
  • December 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • May 2021 (3)
  • December 2020 (1)
  • November 2020 (4)
  • July 2020 (1)
  • June 2020 (1)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (4)
  • February 2020 (7)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • October 2019 (2)
  • September 2019 (4)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • February 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (4)
  • November 2018 (3)
  • October 2018 (3)
  • September 2018 (19)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • August 2017 (1)
  • July 2017 (39)
  • May 2017 (3)
  • April 2017 (4)
  • March 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (4)
  • January 2017 (5)
  • December 2016 (4)
  • November 2016 (4)
  • October 2016 (5)
  • September 2016 (4)
  • August 2016 (5)
  • July 2016 (5)
  • June 2016 (5)
  • May 2016 (3)
  • April 2016 (2)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (2)
  • January 2016 (4)
  • December 2015 (2)
  • November 2015 (2)
  • October 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (2)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (5)
  • April 2015 (3)
  • March 2015 (8)
  • February 2015 (12)
  • January 2015 (28)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Recent Comments

  • Dustin on Eastern University Master of Science in Data Science Half-way Review
  • Joly on Eastern University Master of Science in Data Science Half-way Review
  • Dustin on Crisis Triage Rating Scale (CTRS)
  • thomas mahek on Crisis Triage Rating Scale (CTRS)
  • Dustin on Eastern University MS in Data Science 2022 Review

Tags

analytical technique assessment city council communication community development counselling crisis chat crisis intervention data science eastern university economic development education empathy evaluation forecasting fundraising governance humint intelligence intelligence analysis keokuk county language learning legal local government management peer support personal development politics professional development protective factors psychosocial risk factors safety planning salesforce sigourney social media statistics suicide suicide assessment suicide risk assessment technology terrorism training violence risk assessment youth
© 2023 Dustin K MacDonald | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme